January 25, 2010

My Year of Living Gimmickry

While riding in the back of a bus this weekend, I came across an interesting/depressing article in the Wall Street Journal that I thought said a lot about the current state of journalism. The message, essentially, was that no one has a shot in hell anymore of getting anything published. Ever.

Getting plucked from the slush pile was always a long shot—in large part, editors and Hollywood development executives say, because most unsolicited material has gone unsolicited for good reason. But it did happen for some: Philip Roth, Anne Frank, Judith Guest. And so to legions of would-be novelists, journalists and screenwriters—not to mention “D-girls” and “manuscripts girls” from Hollywood to New York who held the hope that finding a gem might catapult them from entry level to expense account—the slush pile represented The Dream.

via From Anne Frank to Stephenie Meyer: The Slush Pile – WSJ.com.

The Dream was slush? I guess making it as a writer  has always been hard. “The slush pile” is that heap of paper that collects dust in the mailroom or atop a spare office desk that’s comprised of legions of hopeful would-be authors’ manuscripts. Underpaid interns or literary agent assistants would then pick through the wreckage- I did it as an intern at Outside Magazine, my fiancee did it as a literary serf at William Morris, and we are both more cynical people for it.

I have two beefs with this story: 1) the death of the slush pile isn’t a new phenomenon, optimism died a while ago and 2) the only alternative route to publication they suggested was “find another way.” Ok, a touch vague. I can do better, I have a formula. I hope you like stunts.

Stunt journalism, also known by the daintier term immersion journalism, basically means playing tourist in your own- or someone else’s- life. When done honestly and done well, it’s riveting and revelatory. Barbara Erenreich’s book on the plight of America’s poor, Nickel and Dimed, is one example. Bill Buford’s Heat, about his tenure in Mario Batali’s kitchen, is another. Done poorly, it can be condescending, pretentious, pointless and (my favorite writerly sin) navel-gazing.

But my aim here isn’t to savage dozens of books I haven’t read (for that you should go here) but rather give hope, that with some creativity, dedication and  a lot of time on your hands, you too can pitch a book. All you need is a gimmick. A stupid pet trick of sorts, that can be performed consecutively for one year- one day, month or week is acceptable too if you’re pitching an essay. Examples abound:

Animal, Vegetable, Miracle by Barbara Kingsolver, on her year eating only food grown from her Virginia garden. OK, nice conceit and a very good writer. Problem is it is so played out. Michael Pollan kickstarted a revolution within journalism (not sure about the rest of the country): eat turnips in winter! Blog about it! As a year-round berry-eater I applaud their dedication but unless you live in the Yukon, you’re unoriginal.

The Year of Living Biblically by AJ Jacobs, about one man’s quest to follow every tenet in the Bible, literally. Scary, no? The idea of reconciling loving thy neighbor with stoning homosexuals (in Manhattan, no less) could make for compelling reading but Jacobs’ take is Theology Lite. More emphasis on tossing pebbles (tee hee), wearing sandals and beard-growing than wrestling with weighty religious concepts.

The Year of Yes by Maria Davhana Headley, who for one year, bravely said yes to every single man who asked her out. One critic called it “gonzo desperation.” Did I mention  this project might require you to abandon your dignity?

Living Oprah: My One-Year Experiment to Walk the Walk of the Queen of  Talk by Robyn Okrant, who chronicled her year-long experiment following the Big O’s advice on everything in order to Live Her Best Life. Conclusion? “It was incredibly draining and it made me really sad,” she tells Forbes Woman. Wait, is she talking about obeying Oprah or writing a book?

These are just a sampling- I’m afraid I could keep going- but I need to jump on my own gimmick before someone else beats me to it. I have two ideas (either of which can be yours for $10,000 in singles). One was inspired by a recent New York Times Styles story about how emulating cavemen is all the rage among health-conscious hipsters.

The caveman lifestyle, in Mr. Durant’s interpretation, involves eating large quantities of meat and then fasting between meals to approximate the lean times that his distant ancestors faced between hunts. Vegetables and fruit are fine, but he avoids foods like bread that were unavailable before the invention of agriculture.

Via The New Cavemen Lifestyle Has Found a Home in the City – NYTimes.com.

Exercise consists of sprinting and jumping aka mastodon-fleeing. So there’s your book- eat like Barney Rubble for a year and maybe take it a step further- don’t use wheels of any kind, quit shaving, wear pelts- or nothing at all.

My other idea- become a licensed plumber. Me, yes. The idea originated with my condo building’s defunct boiler and the hands-on role I’ve assumed trying to diagnose the problem. The whole ordeal merits its own post but suffice it to say, I’ve grown to admire- nay envy- the plumbing professionals with their unions, comfy workplace attire and formidable power over chilled, clueless New York residents. If “A Single Gal’s Adventures in Plumbing School,” doesn’t pique a publisher’s interest, maybe I can sell it as a television pilot. Sitcom? Reality show? Hey, with no more slush pile there’s no such thing as a bar set too low.

December 15, 2009

Books My Grandma Taught Me

It was December, I was about eight and my good friend Charlotte and I were having a heated school bus discussion about what we Liked Best About Christmas (as if the answer weren’t obvious). “I like the presents!” She said candidly. I was about to concur giddily when I pictured my disapproving mother. Had she been listening, I knew the appropriate answer had to with the a special birth, not gifts. Unlike most of my friends, I went to church and knew better (I found out later in life many of my friends were Jewish) so I hedged. “That’s not the only good thing….the food’s good too.”

Yes, the food. And truth be told, Christmas Eve service was not half bad as far as church goes. But to my selfish, materialistic eight-year-old self, presents were the raison d’etre of solstice. And perhaps the best gift of all, the most highly-anticipated event of the season, was Grandma’s book box.

In my young eyes, my father’s mother was a woman of exceptional taste. She dressed immaculately, always smelled nice, loved horses, stocked her pantry with Apple Jacks and had the most beautiful snow-white updo I’d ever seen. She was spectacularly generous to her 21 grandchildren, shaping our minds not only with sophisticated conversation (grandma never talked down to us) but with her deep appreciation for children’s books. Not only did she have her very own floor-to-ceiling bookshelf stocked with musty treasures to peruse, she shared the wealth with an annual shipment of the latest and greatest in children’s literature.

I was grateful for the books at the time. I liked the stories, loved the pictures and most of all, adored their smell. But my appreciation for them now is tenfold. While I don’t own any of them anymore, there is nothing more comforting than re-discovering them in bookshops, flipping through the familiar images and finding that I still have many passages committed to memory. So while I’m not (yet) in a position to send a book box to a young family, I can still share a few favorites:

1. “Go Dog Go” by Philip D. Eastman

Admittedly, Grandma did not give this to me, nor am I sure she would approve (it’s no Dr. Seuss) but I’m including it here because it is the book that taught me to read. The book that I sat with one steamy summer day- the day I realized my parent’s time and attention was limited so if I wanted stories I better learn to read- sounding out words, red-faced and sweating. I can acutely remember the searing frustration every time I came to page 5 and the line “It is hot up here in the sun.” The word “here” bedeviled me, it made zero phonetic sense. But if you could get past “here” you’d move on to the reliably enthralling “Do You Like My Hat?” vignette featuring an amorous mutt trying to impress a snooty poodle by wearing outlandish hats. Priceless.

2. Good Dog Carl by Alexandra Day

Yes, another dog book. This one, about a hulking Rottweiler who tends to his mistress’s baby while she’s out shopping, is no narrative masterpiece. But the finely-wrought drawings- of Carl “serving” lunch on the floor, bathing baby Madeline- are lush and sweetly realistic. A gentle bear of a dog keeping watch over his cherubic charge fit my animal-loving ideal of how the world should be.

3. The Snowy Day by Ezra Jack Keats

The cover says it all. A little boy named Peter ventures around his neighborhood after the season’s first snowfall. No plot, really, but no matter. Every one of Peter’s observations- of snowbanks, footprints, the tragedy of melting- jibed with my own snowy explorations as a little kid.  Vivid, simple drawings made it a repeat favorite. And reassuring to know I wasn’t the only one who had to wear a stupid snowsuit.

4. Little Black Sambo by Helen Bannerman

Ok, I know what you’re thinking. Politically-incorrect at best, racist at worst, this tale of an Indian boy who outsmarts a mean pack of tigers was (is) nonetheless one of my favorites. It wasn’t until late into adulthood that its controversial overtones- use of the word “Sambo,” crude illustrations- dawned on me. And while it was a little shocking to know the book I loved so much growing up was considered racist, I think a better description might be “wildly outdated.” To most innocent young readers, Sambo was a hero who managed to turn talking tigers into butter. Even better, Sambo’s mom served up the tiger butter at dinner as an accompaniment to pancakes. Pancakes for dinner (with butter no less) was the only part of the book my 6-year-old self could see as being possibly controversial.

5. Tasha Tudor’s The Night Before Christmas

Far and away my favorite Christmas book, Tudor’s signature fairy-tale illustrations make the time-honored tale simply glow. Heaven for me will be straight out of a Tasha Tudor drawing, full of rosy-cheeked babies, cozy farm houses and chubby Corgis. Her potbellied Santa Claus was the  one I imagined stuffing stockings downstairs- the guy who had a party at every stop and treated his reindeer like family.

There are so many more- maybe another installment. Happy Christmas to all.

December 2, 2009

Too Cool to Fail

The other evening I had the distinct pleasure of sharing an elevator with this guy (left).

This guy, is Andrew Ross Sorkin, a New York Times business reporter and one of the most powerful and celebrated journalists in town.

At the tender age of 32 Sorkin has authored a bestselling book, launched a lucrative, wildly-influential news division of the Times (providing much-needed Botox for the old Grey Lady) and broken hundreds- if not thousands- of stories.

Impressive achievements all. However what’s most notable about Sorkin to me is that he’s a courted, desired, well-compensated journalist in an age when newsrooms can’t fire people fast enough. Amazing. How did he do it? Out of curiosity (and jealousy) I paid $65 to see him speak at book signing hosted by our mutual alma mater’s networking club to see if I could shake him down for his secrets.

It didn’t go down quite like that, but there were some illuminating moments. Quick background: Sorkin is on a publicity tour for  his new book, “Too Big to Fail: The Inside Story of How Wall Street and Washington Fought to Save the Financial System- and Themselves.” The title’s fairly self-explanatory, but the gist is that it’s a detailed account of the dramatis personae most intimately involved in the events leading up to Lehman Brothers’ collapse in September 2008.

I confess I’m on page 44 (and can’t wait to see how it ends!) so am not really in a position to judge but then again judging is what blogging is all about so here goes.

What makes Too Big remarkable is not the writing- which is serviceable- but the astounding detail Sorkin delves into about the thoughts, lives and moves of the execs and officials that fatal week. They’re all accounted for: Paulson, Geithner, Fuld, Mack…he got transcripts, scrupulous notes from top-secret meetings, calendars and tearful confessions. It reads (so far) like Danielle Steele, a crowd-pleasing romp through boardrooms and town cars. The color and nuance in every exchange verges on unbelievable.

That exacting detail lies at the heart of Sorkin’s controversial reputation. How did he wring damning tidbits from the biggest Masters of the Universe? Great sources- too great, say critics (many of them fellow journalists) who accuse Sorkin of blurring the ethical line by fraternizing with the Wall Street tipsters who help him break dozens of deals. Sorkin as the enfant terrible in the Times newsroom was pondered by New York Magazine last month in an article which summarized the tension thusly:

In these dark days for newspapers, Sorkin, with his un-Timesian public face, unorthodox methods, and precocious success, has become a flashpoint for some of his colleagues. At bottom, they see him as far too cozy with his sources. In a profession that tends, with religious fervor, to draw bright lines and stay behind them, Sorkin seems to cross back and forth without a care. While he has written critically about the financial mandarins he covers, a fawning quality can ooze into his prose that some other Times people find unbecoming

Via : How Andrew Ross Sorkin’s Book ‘Too Big to Fail’ Has Conflicted His Image at the New York ‘Times’ — New York Magazine

Sour grapes? Possibly. But this description of Too Big’s book party gave me pause:

Attendees—Sorkin’s presumed unnamed sources—included Jamie Dimon, John Mack, Ken Griffin, Steve Rattner, and Barry Diller. Warren Buffett mailed in an Ed McMahon–size “colossal-gram” that read, “Andrew … Congratulations! Your book will be bigger than this telegram.”

It’s the great conundrum of being a journalist- if your subjects or sources love your story you feel you’ve been too soft. If they hate it, you wonder if you were unfair. If you hear nothing- great. But wait- did anyone read it then? You lose on all fronts.

I don’t know where Sorkin falls on the slimebag spectrum when it comes to how he sources scoops but I have one theory (also suggested in the Nymag article): dudes love him.  There is a certain kind of guy- young, with a boyish charm and scrappy, eager air- that other men cotton to for whatever reason. I happen to be engaged to such a guy so I’ve spent some time witnessing the phenomenon firsthand.

Sorkin was introduced at the talk I attended by his college advisor, a communications professor who spent almost half an hour (60% of the evening’s allotted time) narrating a gushy, fawning, awed tribute to his former student. No superlative was too lavish- brilliant, clever, handsome! Did you know current students consistently voted him most eligible alum until a vixen named Pilar Queen took him off the market? It’s true! He rode in the Rolling Stones’ tour bus! By the time Sorkin took the stage, the entire audience was thoroughly embarrassed.

During the Q&A, men in suits couldn’t rush the mic fast enough, lobbing eager (softball) questions to the ink-stained wunderkind, his 600-page hardcover clutched in their hands.

If I sound envious, I am and I’m not. Who wouldn’t envy Sorkin’s success and the respect he gets from (some of) his colleagues and readers? Provided he’s toed the ethical line, he’s gotten where he is on hard work, ambition, aggression and savvy. It’s inspiring in this media market to know someone- even if it’s just one freakin’ person- can be rewarded richly for this craft.

I am envious- or bitter- I suppose in that I didn’t get the best of impressions of Sorkin during our 2-second interaction in the elevator. He didn’t hold the door open for me when I was dashing in heels, he looked away when I smiled at him and was kind of a jackass to the check-in lady. Maybe he just reminds me of those douche-y guys from college who talked constantly in class and hit on freshmen. Maybe it’s because he resembles Ryan from the office (crossed with a handsomer Mr. Bean) or maybe I’m nursing a grudge because he was a Communications major. Everyone knows that’s a joke.

November 19, 2009

The Bridal-Industrial Complex

Dear Devon:

Thank you for participating in the Bridal Salon Show! I received your contact from the organizers and had the permission to follow up with you. Attached please find some information on Aruba that might be useful in planning your Wedding or Honeymoon!

Welcome to Aruba!

Sincerely,

Charly from Aruba

At last count, I have over 200 of these “personal” messages coagulating in my in-box. If it’s not Charly from Aruba suggesting fun and sun in Aruba (!!!) it’s Roey an editorial-photojournalist-with-an-artistic-eye-for-capturing-unique-wedding-settings or Erin, touting the quaint charm of wedding in Colonial Williamsburg. Brian Alex with his “custom love songs,” Donut Divas’ wedding chocolate and Sadick Dermatology’s…botox. All the prerequisite goods and services needed for The Best Night of Your Life.

Despite checking the “please don’t let vendors stalk me”  box when I signed up to attend the 2009 Wedding Salon at New York’s Palace Hotel earlier this month I find myself navigating a torrent of viral marketing which hasn’t let up since I exited the expo towing 10-pounds worth of bridal swag.

It is no secret that weddings are big business. Trade stats from the Association of Wedding Professionals show that in 2008 alone American couples and their families shelled out approximately $86 billion planning and hosting The Big Day. That’s the equivalent of 2,429 trips to the moon*, the market cap of Verizon or the entire GDP of Bangladesh. You might even be able to hire Barbara Streisand for that amount. And considering that that $86 billion goes to furnishing livings for hundreds of thousands of people (planners, DJ’s, TLC Network hosts) it is no wonder a trip through the Wedding Salon’s labyrinthine  exhibits felt like a breakneck spin through every Disney theme park.

To recap:

1. Registration

A winding velvet-roped line at least three dozen brides-to-be deep. A veritable rainbow of ethnicities, sizes and accents the women looked unvariably young- expos have lost their luster the second time around, I suspect- and giddy. Some brought files full of careful planning notes, some brought their mothers and one unsmiling brunette in a sharp tailored suit brought her fiancee. While we waited, a bored-looking five-piece cover band in purple polyester suits played Bryan Adams. When my turn came, an expo officiant took my name and tied a yellow ribbon tightly around my wrist, warning me sternly not to take it off if I wanted to collect my goody bag on the way out.

2. Indoctrination

A  militant lesbian claustrophobe’s living hell, the expo halls were packed with sweet, lacy frivolity. Beaming lovelies modeling gowns strolled the carpet, handing out designer’s business cards like Snow Whites proffering photo opps. Sweaty tuxedo-clad gentlemen with gelled hair beckoned from booths: “Hey honey, have you booked a videographer?” Severe congestion at the cake samples forced me to detour through the sit-down dinner displays which showcased glass, floral and ceramic centerpieces so enormous they conveniently blocked a diner’s view of everyone else at the table. Ducking the line to the hair stylists “free updo and makeover” giveaway, I arrived in the final room a hodgepodge of stationary and catering vendors. Sipping on a sample signature cocktail- a Listerine-hued wine cooler type thing, garnished with a rock candy swizzle stick- I waited to chat with the statuesque founder of CECI invitations, the fairy godmother of letterpress. So I waited. And waited. And eventually gave up, hands sticky, head spinning, arms overflowing with glossy brochures. I headed for the exit.

3. Deliberation

Finally, time to fetch my well-earned goody bag. The 5′ x 4′ ivory shopping tote was stuffed with bride-appropriate curios: a pewter keychain in the shape of a ball gown, hair extension clips, a sample size bottle of musky aftershave (?), several more pounds of glossy brochures and three bridal magazines- two of which have since gone out of business.

That’s right- out of business. Apparently not even $86 billion is enough to sustain magazine publishing these days. Go figure.

*Based on the $35 million paid by billionaire Charles Simonyi for a 10-day trip to the International Space Station in March 2009

November 10, 2009

Post-Punk Gastropub

There are few things I loathe more than the  the prefix “Post.” “Post-modern?” Can someone, anyone please concisely define that word for me? I’ve asked dozens of professors, art students, anthropologists, literary critics, dandies and hipsters and never received a satisfactory answer. So it’s not without trepidation that I’m titling my first self-indulgent exercise in navel gazing (blog) with the word. Yes, in this case it just might be appropriate.

Allow me to explain-

I live on a funky little block on the southern fringe of Park Slope, Brooklyn, a cheerful, much-gentrified neighborhood that hasn’t been dangerous in decades but is still inconvenient enough to Manhattan that it’s maintained a modicum of hipness [If you haven't heard of Park Slope, it's a little like this or this]. For the past year and a half I’ve lived in an aging prewar building perched on the crest of said Slope that according to local lore was converted by the mob in the late ’80’s into condos.

For the past dozen years the street level commercial unit of the building was occupied by a low-key, low-profile, BYOB, cash-only (sensing a pattern?) Middle Eastern restaurant that did a mystifyingly steady business. Mystifying in that the food was lousy, the decor nonexistent and the venue visibly filthy. I love a good hummus or even a not-so-good hummus but theirs was appalling in a way I can’t even describe. Runny, thin, bland, sad.

All of this would be excusable had us residents had an easy time dealing with the owner but to make a long story short, we didn’t. Sami (an alias), the short, bald, blunt owner showed up on his motorcycle to the restaurant at most, once a week, to collect his cash. Chasing him down to pay his monthly condo fees was as frustrating and circuitous as finalizing paperwork at the DMV.

So when I got word that Sami had sold his restaurant (confirming a hunch I had since he’d pounded down my door for a copy of the condo offering plan a few weeks earlier) I was thrilled. I had seen rumors online that a new joint was opening on my exact intersection but hadn’t dared imagine the sleepy falafel joint could actually make way for anything resembling a “turn-of-the-century tavern setting.”

Dare to dream, folks. Mine was realized Sunday evening when I met David, the new proprietor of Thistle Hill Tavern, the casual, cozy new eatery slated to open in January which the new owner sheepishly described with that overwrought culinary buzz word “gastropub.” In keeping with unofficial gospel of all new Brooklyn dining establishments, Thistle Hill’s fare will be seasonal and locally-sourced, leftovers will be composted and carbon output minimized (The greatest sales pitch nearby Six Point brewing company ever stumbled on). In other words, it will be everything the prior unnamed falafel joint was not. And did I mention the chef was a woman?

And the very best part: this guy is part-owner. That’s right, Fat Mike, frontman of seminal punk band NOFX, who is apparently a childhood friend of one of David’s partners. Hopefully the place will establish a homey neighborhood pub vibe and not a pilgrimage-site-for-aging-punk-rock-nerd vibe. But then again, clinging to youth and coolness when you’re way past your prime pretty much defines this neighborhood so maybe either would be totally appropriate.